Monday, February 24, 2020

Shame on EAC! Obtaining fresh EC is a long process is a reason for waiver..

The mindless coal power project which is being pushed at a great cost to the environment and people in several areas of the world seems to have achieved yet another milestone in side-stepping the law. 

It is no less than a climate crime to fetch coal from Australia, lug in a train for 800 kilometers, build an exclusive rail-line through forests, fetch water from over 100 kilometers and export power to Bangladesh. 

See the amendments of amendments that the EAC is privileged to undertake!
 
MINUTES OF THE 37th MEETING OF THE RE-CONSTITUTED EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE (EAC) ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) OF THERMAL POWER PROJECTS HELD DURING 23rd January 2020.
ANY OTHER ITEM WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE CHAIR 
(37.6) 2x800 MW Imported Coal based Godda Thermal Power Project at Villages Motia, Patwa, Gangta and Nayabad of Godda Block and Sondiha, Petbi, Gayghat, Ranganiya and Mali villages of Poraiyahaat Block, Distt. Godda, Jharkhand by M/s Adani Power (Jharkhand) Limited- reg. amendment in Environmental Clearance. 

(37.6.1) Project Proponent submitted online application on IA/JH/THE/54853/2016 dated 23.12.2019 for amendment in EC dated 31.8.2017.  

  (37.6.2) Project Proponent has made the presentation inter-alia submitted the following information:

 i. The Environmental Clearance (EC) for 2x800 MW Imported coal based Thermal Power Project proposed in District Godda, Jharkhand was issued to M/s Adani Power (Jharkhand) Ltd. vide Ministry‟s letter dated 31.8.2017.

 ii. The Ministry also amended the EC for change in water source from Chir River to Ganga River vide letter dated 3.9.2019.

 iii. Para 5 of EC amendment dated 03.9.2019 mentioned as below: “Storage reservoir earlier planned in 441 acres has been reduced to 156 acres as the water drawl period has now been increased from 4 months to 6 months.”

 iv. As per the water allocation of 36 MCM/annum made by Water Resource Dept., Govt. of Jharkhand vide letter dated 15.01.2018 stipulated that the water is to be drawn during June till December (07 months). Accordingly, water reservoir will accommodate the water drawn for seven months. Accordingly, the following change is required. “Storage reservoir earlier planned in 441 acres has been reduced to 156 acres as the water drawl period has now been increased from 4 months to 7 months.” 

v. Condition No.7(i) of the EC amendment dated 3.9.2019 stipulates that Stage-I forest clearance to be submitted and formal amendment to be issued after furnishing the Stage-I Clearance. As the Stage-I Forest Clearance was accorded by the Ministry‟s Regional Office, Ranchi vide letter dated 28.6.2019 for diversion of 13.3293 ha for laying water pipeline from Chir River to Power plant, this condition may now be deleted. 

vi. Project Proponent vide their letter dated 16.12.2019 submitted that the said project has now been designated as Special Economic Zone (SEZ) under SEZ Act, 2005 vide Ministry of Commerce and Industry letter dated 20.8.2019 and Notification No.S.O.3327(E) dated 16.9.2019 for an area of 222.668 ha (550.23 acres). The area has been classified as Sector Specific Economic Zone for Power.

 vii. The Environmental Clearance for Power Plant was issued under Sl.1(d) of the Schedule of EIA Notification. 
viii. In view of the new classification of power plant in the SEZ, the project also requires Environmental Clearance under Sl.No.7(c): Special Economic Zone (SEZ) of the Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006. Obtaining fresh EC is a long process. As there is no change in project configuration and scope or entity even after notification of SEZ, the said EC may also be granted under SEZ.

 ix. As per the EC and its amendment, project area was 558 acres. As per the notification of Ministry of Commerce and Industry, SEZ area is 550.23 acres. (37.6.3) Committee noted that project is exclusively meant for export of Power/electricity, and hence notified under Special Economic Zone. Proponent mentioned that the EC was issued for stand alone Thermal Power Plant. Even after notification of SEZ, it remains to be the Single Unit SEZ and there no change in the scope/configuration of the project. The differential area of 7.7  acres shall be developed with greenbelt by project proponent. 

Member Secretary informed that Infrastructure-1 Sector of IA Division has also recommended for giving amendment in EC for inclusion of project category under SEZ.

 (37.6.4) Committee after detailed deliberations, recommended for amendment in EC regarding inclusion of SEZ, storage of water reservoir area to 7 months, deletion of condition on Forest Clearance subject to following additional condition. i. The area of 7.7 acres (Originally proposed: 558 acres & Notified land: 550.23 acres) shall be developed with greenbelt. Demarcation of this land with coordinates and progress of greenbelt is to be submitted in the compliance report.  

Saturday, February 8, 2020

How ignorant is our legal fraternity!


How ignorant is our legal fraternity!
Supreme Court Order in 114/2014
In the course of hearing, this Court on 16.01.2019 passed an order taking cognizance of the deleterious effect of mining on vegetation, after mining activities are over. In particular, it is observed that an area which is mined results in complete elimination of grass which in turn denies fodder to the herbivores.
The only solution can be re-grassing of such mined areas. It is not in dispute that re-grassing technology is available in this country.
We see no reason why the area which has been mined should not be restored so that grass and other vegetations including trees can grow in the mining area for the benefits of animals.
We are of the view that this can be achieved by directing the Union of India to impose a condition in the mining lease and a similar condition in the environmental clearance and the mining plan to the effect that the mining lease holders shall, after ceasing mining operations, undertake re-grassing the mining area and any other area which may have been disturbed due to their mining activities and restore the land to a condition which is fit for growth of fodder, flora, fauna etc.
The Union of India may devise appropriate methods for ensuring compliance of this condition after the mining activity is over at the cost of the mining lease holders. This condition shall be in addition to those conditions which have already been imposed for achieving the same purpose under the mine closure plan. This condition shall not be imposed in derogation of any conditions which are already in force.
The court and the great set of lawyers present in the court failed to mention that the current law goes beyond re-grassing!
If the judges were knowledgeable or the lawyers honest enough to mention that the current legislation calls for tougher conditions than what they are prescribing and all the miners are in complete violation.
Here are the guidelines…
Guidelines for preparation of Mine Closure Plan
Preamble:
1. The Central Government vide Notification No. GSR 329 (E) dated 10.04.2003 and No. GSR 330 (E) dated 10.04.2003 amended the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 and Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 respectively. As per these amendments all the existing mining lessees are required to submit the "Progressive Mine Closure Plan" along with prescribed financial sureties within 180 days from date of notification. Further, the mining lessee is required to submit "Final Mines Closure Plan" one year prior to the proposed closure of the mine. In the notification it has been enumerated that the "Progressive Closure Plan" and "Final Closure Plan" should be in the format and as per the guidelines issued by the Indian Bureau of Mines.
2. Mine closure encompasses rehabilitation process as an ongoing programme designed to restore physical, chemical and biological quality disturbed by the mining to a level acceptable to all concerned. It must aim at leaving the area in such a way that rehabilitation does not become a burden to the society after mining operation is over. It must also aim to create as self-sustained ecosystem.
3. Mine closure operation is a continuous series of activities starting from day one of the initiation of mining project. Therefore, progressive mine closure plan will be an additional chapter in the present mining plan and will be reviewed every five years in the Scheme of Mining. As progressive mine closure is a continuous series of activities, it is obvious that the proposals of scientific mining have had included most of the activities to be included in the progressive mine closure plan. Therefore, reference to relevant paragraphs and a gist of the same in progressive mine closure plan will be sufficient.
4. Final mine closure plan as per statute, shall be considered to have its approval at least nine months before the date of proposed closure of mine. This period of nine months is reckoned as preparatory period for final mine closure operations. Therefore, all proposals for activities which have to be carried out after production of mineral from the mine or mining is ceased, shall be included in the final mine closure plan. The final mine closure plan will thus be a separate document with detailed chapters as per guidelines given below.
The mine closure plan will be prepared as per the guidelines given as enclosure. The guidelines include the specific activities both in progressive mine closure plan and final mine closure plan.

ENCLOSURE
GUIDELINES FOR MINE CLOSURE PLAN
1. Introduction:
The name of the lessee, the location and extent of lease area, the type of lease area (forest, non-forest etc), the present land use pattern, the method of mining and mineral processing operations, should be given.
1.1   Reasons for closure: 
The reasons for closure of mining operations in relation to exhaustion of mineral, lack of demand, uneconomic operations, natural calamity, directives from statutory organisation or court etc. should be specified.
1.2   Statutory obligations: The legal obligations, if any which the lessee is bound to implement like special conditions imposed while execution of lease deed, approval of mining plan, directives issued by the Indian Bureau of Mines, conditions imposed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, State of Central Pollution Control Board or by any other organisation describing the nature of conditions and compliance position thereof should be indicated here (the copies of relevant documents may be attached as Annexure).
1.3   Closure plan preparation: The names and addresses of the applicant and recognised qualified person who prepared the Mine Closure Plan and the name of the existing agency should be furnished. A copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors or any other appropriate administrative authority as the case may be on the decision of closure of mine should be submitted.
2. Mine Description:
2.1 Geology: Briefly describe the topography and general geology indicating rock types available, the chemical constituents of the rocks / minerals including toxic elements if any, at the mine site.
2.2 Reserves: Indicate the mineral reserves available category wise in the lease area estimated in the last mining plan / mining scheme approved along with the balance mineral reserves at the proposed mine closure including its quality available (for final mine closure plan only).
2.3 Mining Method: Describe in brief the mining method followed to win the mineral, extent of mechanisation, mining machinery deployed, production level etc.
2.4 Mineral Beneficiation: Describe in brief the mineral beneficiation practice if any indicating the process description in short. Indicate discharge details of any tailings / middlings and their disposal / utilisation practice followed.
3. Review of Implementation of Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining including five years Progressive Closure Plan upto final closure of mine:
Indicate in detail the various proposals committed with special emphasis on the proposals for protection of environment in the approved Mining Plan / Scheme of Mining including five years Progressive Closure Plan upto the closure of mine vis-a-vis their status of implementation. Highlight the areas, which might have been contaminated by mining activities and type of contaminants that might be found there. The reasons for deviation from the proposals if any with corrective measures taken should also be given.
4.Closure Plan:
4.1 Mined-Out Land: Describe the proposals to be implemented for reclamation and rehabilitation of mined-out land including the manner in which the actual site of the pit will be restored for future use. The proposals should be supported with relevant plans and sections depicting the method of land restoration / reclamation / rehabilitation.
4.2 Water Quality Management : Describe in detail the existing surface and ground water bodies available in the lease areas and the measures to be taken for protection of the same including control of erosion, sedimentation, siltation, water treatment, diversion of water courses , if any, measures for protection of contamination of ground water from leaching etc. Quantity and quality of surface water bodies should also be indicated and corrective measures proposed to meet the water quality conforming the permissible limits should also be described. Report of hydrological study carried out in the area may also be submitted. The water balance chart should be given. If there is potential of Acid Mine Drainage the treatment method should be given.
4.3 Air Quality Management: Describe the existing air quality status. The corrective measures to be taken for prevention of pollution of air should be described.
4.4. Waste Management: Describe the type, quality and quantity of overburden, mineral reject etc. available and their disposal practice. If no utilisation of waste material is proposed, the manner in which the waste material will be stabilised should be described. The protective measures to be taken for prevention of siltation, erosion and dust generation from these waste materials should also be described. If toxic and hazardous elements are present in the waste material the protective measures to be taken for prevention of their dispersal in the air environment, leaching in the surface and ground water etc, should be described.
4.5 Top Soil Management: The top soil available at the site and its utilisation should be described.
4.6 Tailing Dam Management : The steps to be taken for protection and stability of tailing dam, stabilisation of tailing material and its utilisation, periodic desilting, measures to prevent water pollution from tailings etc., arrangement for surplus water overflow alongwith detail design, structural stability studies, the embankment seepage loss into the receiving environment and ground water contaminant if any should be given.
4.7 Infrastructure: The existing infrastructural facilities available such as roads, aerial ropeways, conveyer belts, railways, power lines, buildings & structures, water treatment plant, transport, water supply sources in the area etc. and their future utilisation should be evaluated on case to case basis. If retained, the measures to be taken for their physical stability and maintenance should be described. If decommissioning proposed, dismantling and disposal of building structures, support facilities and other infrastructure like electric transmission line, water line, gas pipeline, water works, sewer line, telephone cables, underground tanks, transportation infrastructure like roads, rails, bridges, culverts etc., electrical equipments and infrastructures like electric cables, transformers to be described in connection with restoring land for further use.
4.8 Disposal of Mining Machinery: The decommissioning of mining machineries and their possible post mining utilisation, if any, to be described.
4.9 Safety and Security: Explain the safety measures implemented to prevent access to surface openings, excavations etc., and arrangements proposed during the mine abandonment plan and upto the site being opened for general public should be described.
4.10 Disaster Management and Risk Assessment: This should deal with action plan for high risk accidents like landslides, subsidence flood, inundation in underground mines, fire, seismic activities, tailing dam failure etc. and emergency plan proposed for quick evacuation, ameliorative measures to be taken etc. The capability of lessee to meet such eventualities and the assistance to be required from the local authority should also be described.
4.11 Care and maintenance during temporary discontinuance : For every five yearly review ( as given in the mining scheme), an emergency plan for the situation of temporary discontinuance or incomplete programme due to court order or due to statutory requirements or any other unforeseen circumstances, should include a plan indicating measures of care, maintenance and monitoring of status of unplanned discontinued mining operations expected to re-open in near future. This should detail item wise status monitoring and maintenance with periodicity and objective.
5. Economic Repercussions of closure of mine and manpower retrenchments:
Manpower retrenchment, compensation to be given, socio-economic repercussions and remedial measures consequent to the closure of mines should be described, specifically stating the following.
5.1 Number of local residents employed in the mine, status of the continuation of family occupation and scope of joining the occupation back.
5.2 Compensation given or to be given to the employees connecting with sustenance of himself and their family members.
5.3 Satellite occupations connected to the mining industry - number of persons engaged therein - continuance of such business after mine closes.
5.4 Continued engagement of employees in the rehabilitated status of mining lease area and any other remnant activities.
5.5 Envisaged repercussions on the expectation of the society around due to closure of mine.

6. Time Scheduling for abandonment:
The details of time schedule of all abandonment operations as proposed in para 4 should be described here. The manpower and other resources required for completion of proposed job should be described. The schedule of such operations should also be supplemented by PERT (Programme Evaluation & Review Technique), Bar chart etc.
7. Abandonment Cost: 
Cost to be estimated based on the activities required for implementing the protective and rehabilitation measures including their maintenance and monitoring programme.
8. Financial Assurance: 
The financial assurance can be submitted in different forms as stated in Rule 23(F)(2) of Mineral Conservation and Development (amendment) Rules, 2003. In the mine closure plan, the manner in which financial assurance has been submitted and its particulars have to be indicated. For Model Bank Guarantee Form, please click here.
9. Certificate: 
The above-mentioned actions have been taken to be stated clearly in the mine closure plan. A certificate duly signed by the lessee to the effect that said closure plan complies all statutory rules, regulations, orders made by the Central or State Government, statutory organisations, court etc. have been taken into consideration and wherever any specific permission is required the lessee will approach the concerned authorities. The lessee should also give an undertaking to the effect that all the measures proposed in this closure plan will be implemented in a time bound manner as proposed.
10. Plans, Sections etc.: 
The chapter 1,2,3 and 4 should be supported with Plans and Sections. The Closure Plan may also be submitted depicting photographs, satellite images on compact disc etc. wherever possible.
NOTE
1. The mine closure plan in progressive stage will be prepared by paragraphs where sub-paragraphs may be added for detailed items whereas the final mine closure plan will be prepared in chapters with sub-chapters as necessary with adequate details.
2. The guidelines for the both the documents will be same as above.
Why this?
The Courts are passing verdicts, Justice is a far cry and notional according to the whims and fancies of our legal fraternity!

Friday, February 7, 2020

Reality about Coal Stock, Why Should the Government mislead Rajya Sabha?


Ministry of Coal Coal in a press release claimed that stocks at power plants increase by 77% to 34.25 MT. The reality is that the Pit Head Closing Stocks have been much higher according to the Coal Ministry’s own Statistics.
Pit Head Closing Stock [MT]
The Reality
Year
Coal
Lignite
2009-10
64.863
0.565
2010-11
72.192
0.610
2011-12
74.040
1.051
2012-13
63.049
1.493
2013-14
55.514
1.860
2014-15
59.389
3.176
2015-16
65.361
4.809
2016-17
76.889
6.883
2017-18
62.043
7.210
2018-19
57.640
5.672
Source: Provisional Coal Statistics 2018-19, GOI
Coal stocks at power plants peaked to 34.25 million tonnes on January 26, equivalent to 19 days’ consumption, and up by 77% as against 19.36 million tonnes, equivalent to 12 days’ consumption at the same time last year. “Thrust has been also given to augment coal supplies to non-power sector by holding regular auction for coal linkages where the consumers have been given the flexibility to choose nearest mine, quality (grade, size) etc. To facilitate easy availability of coal to all the sectors, Coal Companies are also offering increased coal under spot and exclusive e-auction.” Union Coal Minister Shri Pralhad Joshi said in a reply in the Rajya Sabha.
Now you can mine any which way and take it in your own unique way!
The Minister informed that various steps have been taken to ensure the easy and adequate availability of coal to every coal dependent industries/Power Sector. The power houses in close vicinity of the coalfields were offered coal for enhanced lifting of coal through captive mode (like Belt Piped Conveyor (BPC), Merry-go-Round (MGR) etc.) and road modes. For augmentation of supplies, the power houses were advised to move coal through Goods Sheds by Road-cum-Rail (RCR) mode. Efforts were made to enhance supplies through captive modes of transport like MGR, Belts, Ropeways etc. Supplies of coal to power houses through all modes were prioritized. Rationalization of Linkages were ensured to reduce transportation cost.
The Coal and Mines Minister further added that the recently promulgated ‘Mineral Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020' has brought amendment in the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act) and the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 [CMSP Act] to allow wider participation and competition in auctions. The companies which do not possess any prior coal mining experience in India can now participate in auction of coal blocks. Any company selected through auction/allotment can carry on coal mining operation for own consumption, sale or for any other purposes, as may be specified by the Central Government. The Minister also informed that Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has granted Environmental Clearances to 13 coal projects during calendar year 2019. About 4 to 6 billion tonnes of proved coal resources are added in a year and the proved coal resources in the country are about 155.6 billion tonnes as on April 1, 2019.